Friday, February 21, 2014
Cousin Jules (February 22nd and 23rd at the Cleveland Cinematheque)
[COUSIN JULES screens Saturday February 22nd at 5:15 pm and Sunday February 23rd at 6:30 pm at the Cleveland Cinematheque.]
Review by Charles Cassady, Jr.
But in today's high-speed days of NSA terrorism, "twerking" Disney starlets, Browns coach firings and economic death spirals, WHO HAS THE TIME??!! to get absorbed into a David Sutherland-style narrative. The Cleveland Cinematheque has an answer to farm-cinema, with a rediscovery of French filmmaker Dominique Benicheti's 1972 COUSIN JULES.
Beginning his film shoot in 1968 and covering several years, Benicheti eavesdropped on his octogenarian cousin Jules Guiteaux, dwelling as a farmer in the French countryside. The resulting film compresses the agrarian existence of Jules and his wife Felicie into just 91 minutes.
It is something of a backhanded compliment (or not) that the movie still feels like years passing by. Unbroken by narration - hardly even any dialogue at all - the filmmaker's mise-en-scene is a slow, detailed study of routine chores and daily rituals of life, shot in glorious deep-focus color Cinemascope. Here is Jules (a stoic man with a face recalling a faded Gallic matinee idol) at his home workshop/ blacksmith's forge, or taking his harvest of bundles of...something...to market.
Even though Felicie and Jules are the same age, she looks old enough to be his mother (and her mangled hand bears a missing index finger in what must have been a painful accident at some point). There is barely any conversation between the two - just some small talk about the meal being hot or who gets to make the coffee now.
Midway through the non-storyline, poor Felicie dies (just signified by a static long shot of a gravedigger at work). One can almost miss the milestone, the main evidence being a silent Jules continuing his mundane activities around the farmstead and hearth, now alone except for a pet cat.
COUSIN JULES isn't trying to dazzle or mesmerize; it's more like an ethnographically faithful scrutiny of its subjects, though the viewer (if not drowsing off) senses affection and admiration rather than the cold, professional detachment of the scientific observer. Just why this is, I can't exactly say. Just a feeling.
In a way the film was rather ahead of its time, anticipating rigidly formal documentaries (such as OUR DAILY BREAD, ironically, about impersonal, mechanized farming and food-production techniques) that were more like wordless visual essays than stories in any form. COUSIN JULES probably won't make any recruits for the life of the plow, field and forge, but it says those who did live that way have nothing to be ashamed of. (3 out of 4 stars)